Search

CHIPS Act Delay Creates a Snowball for US Based Chip Manufacturing

The News: A large chip factory currently in the early stages of being built outside of Columbus, Ohio, could see its scope scaled back or construction delayed depending on what Congress does with the CHIPS Act, Intel said in a statement on Thursday.

The facility was announced in January and would be the most significant expansion of U.S.-based semiconductor manufacturing in years. Intel estimated the plant could cost as much as $100 billion and committed an initial investment of $20 billion.

CHIPS Act Delay Creates a Snowball for US Based Chip Manufacturing

Analyst Take: As the world continues to struggle with massive supply chain shortages that contributed to our out-of-control inflation and massive shortages in automobiles, PCs, smartphones, and countless other technologically enhanced products and goods, the U.S. struggles to move forward with the $52 billion CHIPS Act.

Intel has been aggressively committing investments, including its up to $100 billion mega fab to help bring resiliency to the semiconductor supply chain while also executing its multi-year strategy to innovate its manufacturing, design, and fabrication business—something that not only America needs, but the world sorely needs. However, the aggressive commitments made by Intel were done under the onus that the U.S. government would pass the Chips Act and make a number of contributions through grants and tax incentives. At this point, without those incentives, Intel is in a situation where it must pause until policymakers pass the legislation and/or provide greater clarity as to what is ahead.

While much attention right now is focused on the stifling high inflation and the implications of the war in Ukraine and Russia, which is further damaging supply chains and driving oil and gas prices through the roof, there has been a bit of a lax response to the massive damage that has been caused by our fragile supply chain—especially for semiconductors.

And the risks of our continued inaction are becoming increasingly disconcerting—be it the national security risks of losing ground as the world’s semiconductor innovation leader, or the risks of not being able to manufacture enough chips in the event of an attack on Taiwan or other nations where we have grown dependent for semiconductor production.

For perspective, the current semiconductor manufacturing landscape looks as follows:

Tooling:
China volume going up 5-10%
Volume going everywhere else going down

Planned Projects:
China 40
Taiwan 20
US 5

It is easy to see that the US is in a critical moment where investment in the manufacturing and advancement of US chip development should be an imperative. The inaction of our policymakers is reaching an impasse and demonstrates a level of incapacity or incompetency that is borderline criminal. Our dependence on Taiwan has stretched beyond what is reasonable, especially given the delicate state of Taiwan’s relations with China. It’s time for us to not only pass this act, but think much bigger about the national security implications, and the importance of being the world’s leader in technology and semiconductor development.

Disclosure: Futurum Research is a research and advisory firm that engages or has engaged in research, analysis, and advisory services with many technology companies, including those mentioned in this article. The author does not hold any equity positions with any company mentioned in this article.

Analysis and opinions expressed herein are specific to the analyst individually and data and other information that might have been provided for validation, not those of Futurum Research as a whole.

Other insights from Futurum Research:

Intel Announces Plan to Build Chip Manufacturing Complex in Ohio

Intel Delays “Sapphire Rapids” CPU Chips

Intel Axes Nervana AI Chips Making Habana The Path Forward

Image Credit: Mint

Author Information

Daniel is the CEO of The Futurum Group. Living his life at the intersection of people and technology, Daniel works with the world’s largest technology brands exploring Digital Transformation and how it is influencing the enterprise.

From the leading edge of AI to global technology policy, Daniel makes the connections between business, people and tech that are required for companies to benefit most from their technology investments. Daniel is a top 5 globally ranked industry analyst and his ideas are regularly cited or shared in television appearances by CNBC, Bloomberg, Wall Street Journal and hundreds of other sites around the world.

A 7x Best-Selling Author including his most recent book “Human/Machine.” Daniel is also a Forbes and MarketWatch (Dow Jones) contributor.

An MBA and Former Graduate Adjunct Faculty, Daniel is an Austin Texas transplant after 40 years in Chicago. His speaking takes him around the world each year as he shares his vision of the role technology will play in our future.

SHARE:

Latest Insights:

The Futurum Group’s Dr. Bob Sutor looks at five generative AI Python code generators to see how well they follow instructions and whether their outputs check for errors and are functionally complete.
Cerebras CS-3 Powered by 3rd Gen WSE-3 Delivers Breakthrough AI Supercomputer Capabilities Matching Up Very Favorably Against the NVIDIA Blackwell Platform
The Futurum Group’s Ron Westfall assesses why the Cerebras CS-3, powered by the WSE-3, can be viewed as the fastest AI chip across the entire AI ecosystem including the NVIDIA Blackwell platform.
Rubrik Files an S-1 with the US SEC for Initial Public Offering
Krista Macomber, Research Director at The Futurum Group, shares her insights on Rubrik’s S-1 filing with the United States Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) to go public.
The Futurum Group’s Steven Dickens provides his take on Equinix's latest announcement as Equinix pivots to a digital infrastructure leader, investing in AI-ready data centers to meet growing technological demands with a new facility in California.